ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Mitochondrial dysfunction in ARDS: unraveling the regulatory networks and therapeutic opportunities.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition with high mortality and limited effective pharmacotherapies. Accumulating evidence has established mitochondrial dysfunction as a central pathogenic hub in ARDS. Injured mitochondria exhibit excessive reactive oxygen species production, impaired mitophagy, aberrant dynamics (predominantly Drp1-mediated fission), reduced biogenesis, and release of mitochondrial DNA as a damage-associated molecular pattern. These alterations trigger inflammatory cascades via the cGAS/STING and NLRP3 pathways, while simultaneously driving a metabolic shift from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis, the Warburg effect. Key glycolytic enzymes, including PKM2, PDK4, GAPDH, and PGK1, reinforce mitochondrial damage through lactate production and HIF-1α stabilization, creating a vicious cycle. Notably, PFKFB3 exhibits cell-type-specific duality, exerting protective effects in alveolar epithelial cells while promoting NETosis in neutrophils. Distinct cell types in the lung, alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, alveolar epithelial cells, and pulmonary endothelial cells exhibit unique mitochondrial and metabolic alterations that collectively perpetuate injury and impair repair. Therapeutically, mitochondria-targeted agents (MitoQ, MOTS-c), modulators of mitochondrial dynamics (baicalein, hydrogen), inhibitors of glycolytic enzymes (PFKFB3, PKM2, PDK4), natural compounds (1-octyl itaconate, shikonin, scutellarin), and mesenchymal stromal cell-mediated mitochondrial transfer have shown promise in preclinical models. This review synthesizes current understanding of the regulatory mechanisms linking mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic reprogramming in ARDS, discusses cell-type-specific contributions, and highlights emerging therapeutic strategies. Targeting mitochondrial homeostasis and the associated glycolytic shift may offer a transformative approach to ARDS treatment, though challenges related to cell specificity, safety, and clinical translation remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.