ArticleMedComm2026
Prediction of Antimicrobial Resistance in People Living With Cystic Fibrosis Using Machine Learning.
Article in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing challenge in people living with cystic fibrosis (pwCF), who often experience chronic lung infection and repeated antibiotic exposure. Because routine antibiotic susceptibility testing often takes several days, treatment is frequently started before current resistance profiles are available. We assessed whether routinely collected electronic healthcare records (EHR) could predict antibiotic resistance in sputum cultures from adults with CF. In this retrospective single-center study, 12,618 sputum cultures from 209 pwCF between 2012 and 2022 were linked with 63,823 days of intravenous antibiotic exposure, spirometry, demographic characteristics, microbiology results, and historical resistance data. Different models were trained and evaluated with patient-level splitting and cross-validation to predict resistance to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tobramycin. Extreme gradient boosting showed the most consistent performance with AUCs of 0.75-0.80. Model discrimination was broadly similar in cultures with and without Pseudomonas aeruginosa, except for ceftazidime and meropenem. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) suggested that longer term resistance history was more informative than recent results. These findings support the feasibility of using EHR-derived data to estimate AMR before culture results are available, but external validation, broader antibiotic exposure data, and assessment of temporal dataset shift are needed before clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.