ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
The effectiveness of an integrated CBL and BOPPPS model in neurological nursing clinical teaching: a comparative study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop an integrated teaching plan that combines case-based learning (CBL) with the BOPPPS teaching model, its application effect in clinical practice education for neurological nursing, and provide an optimized pathway for training specialized nursing personnel. Methods: We conducted a single-centre, non-randomized quasi-experimental study with two parallel groups. Eighty-six nursing students who completed internships in our hospital from September 2024 to August 2025 were allocated to two groups by internship batch (43 per group); allocation was therefore non-random. The control group received the lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching model, and the experimental group received the combination of CBL and BOPPPS teaching model. Teaching effectiveness was compared between groups using theoretical assessments, the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), the Chinese Version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CTDI-CV), and a satisfaction survey. Between-group differences were analysed with independent-samples Results: The experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group in theoretical knowledge (87.62 vs. 78.45; Cohen's d = 1.51). Clinical practical ability, measured by OSCE, was also significantly higher in the experimental group (85.36 vs. 76.28; d = 1.72). The experimental group also achieved a higher post-internship CTDI-CV total score (289.57 vs. 269.63; d = 1.01). Teaching satisfaction was higher in the experimental group (mean overall score of 92.45 vs. 81.36; d = 2.44). Conclusion: In this quasi-experimental setting, the integrated CBL and BOPPPS model was associated with improved theoretical knowledge, clinical practical ability, and critical thinking dispositions of nursing interns in neurology, and with higher students' learning satisfaction. These findings suggest the model is a promising approach to clinical teaching that warrants further multi-centre, randomized evaluation before broad promotion in specialized nursing education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.