ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Implementing emerging customer screening standards for nucleic acid synthesis.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The decision to fulfill an order for synthetic nucleic acids hinges on whether the customer can be trusted to receive them. A consensus on customer screening practices that allow synthesis providers to make that decision has begun to emerge. In 2024-2025, international and national-level guidance aligned on five practices: tiered screening, with more rigorous screening for orders containing sequences of concern (SOCs); identity verification for all customers; legitimacy verification for customers ordering SOCs; legitimate use verification for SOCs; and supply chain screening to address third-party vendors and multi-party distribution. Translating this emerging consensus into practical tools, however, reveals persistent ambiguities about appropriate due diligence and decision-making. Drawing on experience developing standardized customer screening forms, this paper describes the emerging consensus on best practices, analyzes implementation challenges, and recommends five projects to strengthen customer screening: establishing a globally-relevant baseline of customer attributes that should trigger additional scrutiny; clarifying ambiguities through geographically diverse case studies; encouraging automated identity verification; leveraging existing institutional and government approvals to demonstrate legitimacy; and integrating sequence and customer screening across standardized risk tiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.