ReviewGland surgery2026
Perioperative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma care in 2025: who needs neoadjuvant?-who needs radiation?
Review in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in multimodal therapy, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a highly fatal tumor. For surgically resectable and borderline-resectable PDAC (BR-PDAC), the optimal integration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy has yet to be established. Recent randomized studies (e.g., ESPAC-5F, NORPACT-1, Alliance A021501, and PREOPANC) and updated guidelines [of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), and Japanese Society of Hepato‑Biliary‑Pancreatic Surgery (JASPAC)] now identify which patients are likely to benefit from treatment before surgery. For resectable PDAC, upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (typically modified FOLFIRINOX) remains the standard of care. However, new research (e.g., Prep-02/JSAP05) suggests that some high-risk patients may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. For BR-PDAC, neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy (typically FOLFIRINOX) is widely accepted as the standard approach for increasing the likelihood of margin-negative resection and improving survival. Induction chemotherapy (with or without ablative radiotherapy) is commonly employed to downstage tumors in locally advanced PDAC. Debate continues as to the role of radiotherapy [either conventional chemoradiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)]. PREOPANC reported a slight survival benefit for preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in resectable PDAC and BR-PDAC, while Alliance A021501 reported no additional benefit from SBRT following FOLFIRINOX in BR-PDAC. Advanced imaging [multiphasic computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)] enhances the precision of staging and response evaluation. Molecular diagnostics, particularly germline/somatic BRCA and KRAS status and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring, are currently informing perioperative decisions and innovative therapeutics. As of 2025, personalized perioperative care guided by resectability status, tumor biology, and patient-specific characteristics has emerged as the key strategy for optimizing the selection of patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. This review sought to synthesize the most recent evidence and guidelines on the treatment of resectable, BR, and locally advanced PDAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.