Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591951›Full record

ArticleEuropean clinical respiratory journal2026

Transthoracic drainage of lung abscesses (TOLA): protocol for a national multicenter randomized open-label trial.

Katrine Kristensen, Uffe Bodtger, Søren Helbo Skaarup, Christian B Laursen, Ulla Møller Weinreich, Iben Rahbek Andersen, Marianne Kragh Thomsen, Zaigham Saghir, Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Elisabeth Bendstrup and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European clinical respiratory journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07247461 (TOLA), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07247461 narecruitingnot on this map

TOLA: Transthoracic Drainage of Lung Abscesses. A National Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2026 to 2029Enrolled84ConditionsLung AbscessArmsTransthoracic drainage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Katrine KristensenDepartment of Respiratory Disease and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9041-2986
Uffe BodtgerRespiratory Research Unit (PLUZ), Department of Internal and Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde & Næstved, Roskilde & Næstved, Denmark.
Søren Helbo SkaarupDepartment of Respiratory Disease and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christian B LaursenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Ulla Møller WeinreichDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Iben Rahbek AndersenDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Marianne Kragh ThomsenDepartment of Respiratory Disease and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Zaigham SaghirDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Jens-Ulrik Stæhr JensenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Elisabeth BendstrupDepartment of Respiratory Disease and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren SperlingDepartment of Respiratory Disease and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas FløeDepartment of Respiratory Disease and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lung abscess (LA) is a rare but severe necrotizing pulmonary infection associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Current management relies on prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy without systematic use of abscess drainage. However, small case series and retrospective studies suggest that transthoracic drainage may be a safe and effective adjunctive intervention improving treatment response. Historically, drainage has been avoided for fear of fistulation, but evidence supporting this is weak. High-quality evidence from randomized trials regarding interventional treatment of LA is lacking. This trial aims to determine whether transthoracic drainage combined with standard antibiotic therapy reduces hospital stay, compared with standard antibiotics alone in patients with LA. Methods: This is a national, multicentre, randomized open-label trial. Adults diagnosed with an LA ≥ 4 cm in diameter, containing fluid, and in contact with the outer third of the lung, will be eligible for the study. A total of 84 patients will be randomized 1:1 to either (1) transthoracic drainage combined with standard antibiotic treatment or (2) standard antibiotic treatment alone. Patients will undergo clinical assessments, laboratory testing, microbiological analyses, CT imaging, and standardized patient-reported outcome measures. Follow-up is scheduled at 1, 4, and 12 weeks post‑discharge. The primary outcome is length of hospital stay. Recruitment started February 2026 with an anticipated inclusion period of 4 years. Perspective: This study will provide the first randomized evidence on the role of transthoracic drainage in LA management. The results may inform national and international clinical guidelines and improve outcomes in patients with this severe condition. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT07247461).

Indexed as

interventional radiologyLung abscesspulmonary infectionrandomized controlled trialtransthoracic drainage

Identifiers

PMID42591951
PMCPMC13463463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.