Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591933›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2026

The comparison outcome of implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix, non-acellular dermal matrix and TiLOOP

Warachya Arjhan, Suphalerk Lohasammakul, Thanachot Kamalapirat, Visnu Lohsiriwat

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Warachya ArjhanDivision of Head Neck and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suphalerk LohasammakulDivision of Head Neck and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanachot KamalapiratDivision of Head Neck and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Visnu LohsiriwatDivision of Head Neck and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6815-3551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy in breast cancer patients has been increasingly performed over the past decade, improving cosmetic outcomes. The use of supportive matrices has increased in recent years. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction between acellular dermal matrix (ADM), non-ADM, and TiLOOP Methods: A retrospective descriptive study, a case series from consecutive patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy with implant-based breast reconstruction using ADM, non-ADM, or TiLOOP Results: A total of 36 breast cancer patients (ages between 22 and 64 years old) who underwent unilateral or bilateral mastectomy with implant-based breast reconstruction were organized into three categories of ADM, non-ADM, and TiLOOP Conclusions: No significant difference in complication between ADM, non-ADM and TiLOOP

Indexed as

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM)breast implantbreast reconstructioncapsular contractureTiLOOP® bra mesh

Identifiers

PMID42591933
PMCPMC13462889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.