ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2026
The perception of judges regarding compulsory admission of people with severe mental illness in Portugal: a qualitative study.
Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Judges can have an important role in the process of compulsory admission, ensuring the rights, freedoms, and guarantees of individuals with severe mental disorders while upholding legal and constitutional principles. Despite their significance in this process, judges' perspectives on compulsory admission and its legislation remain under-researched. This study aimed to explore judges' perceptions, experiences, and opinions regarding compulsory admission. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 judges from seven different Judicial Districts. Participants had between 2 and 55 years of professional experience. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings show that judges generally hold a positive view of the patient and emphasise the protective role of compulsory admission, both for the individual and for society. They recognise the cyclical nature of chronic cases and advocate for greater investment in social structures to address these challenges effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.