ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Axillary surgical de-escalation after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: current evidence, clinical controversies, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has expanded opportunities to de-escalate axillary surgery in breast cancer, but the appropriate extent of surgery remains uncertain across pretreatment nodal stages and post-treatment responses. This focused narrative review synthesizes evidence from pivotal prospective trials and contemporary observational cohorts on the timing and technical optimization of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), stage-specific axillary management after NAT, the integration of regional nodal irradiation (RNI), the management of residual low-volume nodal disease, and the potential omission of axillary surgery. In patients with initial cN0 disease, post-NAT SLNB provides pathologic staging, and a negative result may allow axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to be avoided. In patients with biopsy-proven cN1 disease who convert to ycN0, dual-tracer mapping, retrieval of at least three sentinel lymph nodes, and targeted removal of the previously positive marked node improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce the false-negative rate. However, these diagnostic performance data do not by themselves establish the long-term oncologic safety of omitting ALND. For patients presenting with cN2 disease, ALND remains the standard because prospective evidence supporting SLNB or targeted axillary dissection is limited, although selected patients with HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer who achieve an excellent pathologic response may be candidates for prospective de-escalation studies. The NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304 trial supports consideration of RNI omission in selected patients with initial cN1 disease who convert to ypN0, but it does not demonstrate that radiotherapy can replace ALND. In patients with residual isolated tumor cells or micrometastases, contemporary cohorts show substantial variation in the use of completion ALND and clinically relevant rates of additional nodal involvement, but randomized evidence remains lacking. Complete omission of axillary staging should remain investigational and restricted to carefully selected patients in prospective trials. Future studies should integrate initial nodal burden, residual disease volume, tumor subtype, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy while evaluating recurrence, survival, and treatment-related morbidity. The goal is not de-escalation alone, but identification of the least morbid strategy that preserves reliable staging and durable oncologic control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.