ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
The increasing role of breast-conserving treatment in patients with BRCA-related breast cancer: an appraisal of recent literature.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in BRCA-associated breast cancer remains a subject of ongoing debate, primarily due to concerns regarding local recurrence and the development of second primary tumors. This review provides a critical appraisal of the current evidence comparing BCT and mastectomy, integrating oncologic outcomes with biological insights and patient-centered perspectives. Evidence from cohort studies and meta-analyses indicates that, although BCT is associated with a higher incidence of ipsilateral breast events, this does not translate into inferior long-term survival. This apparent divergence may reflect the distinct biological profile of BRCA-associated tumors, characterized by impaired DNA repair mechanisms and increased responsiveness to systemic treatments, which may enhance therapeutic efficacy, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting. Recent advances in systemic therapies, including PARP inhibitors, along with improvements in radiotherapy and imaging, have broadened the clinical applicability of breast-conserving strategies. Furthermore, considerations related to quality of life and patient preferences reinforce the importance of individualized surgical planning. In this context, BCT can be considered a valid and oncologically sound option for selected BRCA mutation carriers, supporting a tailored multidisciplinary approach to treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.