ArticleCureus2026
Multiple Incidental Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in a Patient With Suspected Duodenal Papillary Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare neoplasms that can mimic periampullary adenocarcinomas, presenting significant diagnostic challenges. Preoperative distinction is crucial due to the distinct prognostic and therapeutic implications of each entity. We report the case of a male patient with obstructive jaundice, whose initial investigation suggested duodenal papillary adenocarcinoma. Preoperative endoscopic biopsy was inconclusive for malignancy. Given the high clinical suspicion, the patient underwent duodenopancreatectomy. Anatomopathological examination of the surgical specimen unexpectedly revealed multiple implants of well-differentiated PNET (Grade G), without evidence of adenocarcinoma. This case illustrates the well-known limitation of endoscopic biopsy in periampullary tumors, which presents false-negative rates of up to a significant percentage. The final diagnosis of multiple Grade G PNETs, a rare condition frequently associated with genetic syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, radically altered the patient's prognosis, which is significantly more favorable compared to papillary adenocarcinoma. Surgical resection remains an indispensable diagnostic and therapeutic tool in cases of biliary obstruction with high suspicion of malignancy, even with negative preoperative biopsies. The incidental finding of Grade G PNET reinforces the importance of complete histopathological analysis of the surgical specimen for adequate diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.