Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591859›Full record

ReviewSage open pathology

The Intersection Between Neuropathology and Artificial Intelligence: A Review.

Fernando Pereira Frassetto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sage open pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fernando Pereira FrassettoFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5778-1299

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly relevant in computational pathology, with expanding applications in neuropathology and neuro-oncology. To provide an overview of the main applications of AI in the evaluation of central nervous system tumors, focusing on diagnostic, prognostic, and integrative approaches, a structured literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, including studies published between 2006 and 2025 that addressed the use of AI in neuropathology and neuro-oncology. AI models have been applied to multiple tasks, including intraoperative diagnosis, tumor classification, prediction of molecular alterations, and integration of multi-omics data. Deep learning approaches, particularly convolutional neural networks and multimodal models, demonstrated high accuracy in several studies. In addition, emerging approaches such as foundation models and large language models have further expanded the scope of AI applications in neuropathology. In conclusion, AI shows significant potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, prognostic assessment, and personalized treatment in neuro-oncology. However, challenges such as data heterogeneity, lack of external validation, and barriers to clinical implementation remain.

Indexed as

computational pathologydeep learning in pathologydigital pathologymachine learning in pathologytumor classification

Identifiers

PMID42591859
PMCPMC13462489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.