ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
A general framework for fidelity assessment.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A general framework for fidelity assessment is outlined to establish common concepts and common measures related to the science of innovations, implementation, and scaling. Fidelity is defined as the extent to which the essential components of an innovation are used in practice. The function of fidelity assessment is to measure the presence and strength of the essential components of an innovation. The general framework identifies the dimensions of fidelity as context, content, and competence, and identifies direct observation, record reviews, and asking others as methods to measure the presence and strength of the essential components. Previous frameworks and uses of fidelity at scale are reviewed. Multifaceted fidelity assessments are used to illustrate the categories in the general framework for fidelity assessment. The general framework can be useful to support quality assurance and sustainable scale-up of interventions, especially for those provided to adversity-affected communities and in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.