Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591834›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Three decades of partnership: lessons from the Duke-open medical institute collaboration in global family medicine.

John Anthony Vaughn, Stephanie Faschang, John Ragsdale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John Anthony VaughnDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Stephanie FaschangSalzburg Stiftung der American Austrian Foundation Schloss Arenberg gem. Betriebs GmbH, Salzburg, Austria.
John RagsdaleDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustained international partnerships in health professions education are critical to strengthening global health systems that follow PHC principles, yet few models demonstrate long-term durability across changing institutional and geopolitical contexts. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with founding participants and archival program materials, this Perspective explores a three-decade partnership between Duke University's Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (DFMCH) and the Open Medical Institute (OMI), examining how it emerged, how it has been sustained for 30 years, and what lessons it offers for global primary health care transformation through education. Established in the mid-1990s, the partnership evolved into a sustained educational exchange that introduced interactive learning models and fostered global networks among physicians from over 130 countries. The collaboration supports the development of global primary care capacity and pedagogical innovation in diverse settings while intentionally mitigating physician "brain drain" from developing countries. Key factors contributing to its longevity include shared mission, relational continuity, and an immersive residential learning environment. An iterative narrative analysis was used to identify key themes related to partnership formation, educational innovation, sustainability, and impact. This Perspective synthesizes these themes to offer insights into the design and durability of international collaborations in health professions education, as well as a transferable framework for developing sustainable global collaborations in health professions education.

Indexed as

family medicineglobal health partnershipshealth profession educationhealth workforce developmentprimary health care (PHC)

Identifiers

PMID42591834
PMCPMC13463144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.