Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591820›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Predictive value of combined electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established coronary artery disease: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Qin Wu, Gang Chen, Jian Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qin WuDepartment of Electrocardiography, Jingxian Hospital, Xuancheng, China.
Gang ChenCardiology Department, Jingxian Hospital, Xuancheng, China.
Jian ChangUltrasound Department, Jingxian Hospital, Xuancheng, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the predictive value of combining conventional ECG parameters (P-wave dispersion, Sokolow-Lyon voltage) and echocardiographic parameters (left atrial volume index, LAVI) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Methods: From January 2024 to February 2026, 306 angiographically confirmed CAD patients were enrolled. All underwent standard 12-lead ECG and transthoracic echocardiography at admission. Over a median follow-up of 15.2 months, 50 patients developed MACE and 256 remained event-free. Baseline ECG (P-wave dispersion, QTc, Sokolow-Lyon voltage) and echocardiographic parameters (LAVI, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index) were compared. Independent predictors were identified by multivariate Cox regression, and a combined model was built. Incremental value was assessed by C-index, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). The study was approved by the institutional review board. Results: The MACE group had higher P-wave dispersion, LAVI, and left ventricular mass index, and lower Sokolow-Lyon voltage and LVEF (all Conclusion: Routinely available ECG-derived P-wave dispersion and echocardiographic LAVI are independent, complementary predictors of MACE in CAD patients. Integrating these two parameters into a simple risk model significantly enhances risk discrimination and reclassification, providing a practical, cost-effective tool for individualized management.

Indexed as

cohort studycoronary artery diseaseECGechocardiographymajor adverse cardiovascular eventsrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID42591820
PMCPMC13463147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.