Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591730›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2026

Standard imaging-guided chest wall perforator flap reconstruction without intraoperative handheld Doppler for granulomatous lobular mastitis: a simplified approach for resource-limited settings.

Zi-Ying Wang, Jia-Wei Yin, Yuan-Yuan Li, Wei Liang, Quan-Feng Shao, Jiao Xue, Bei Zhu, Lin Zheng, Wei-Xian Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zi-Ying WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Jia-Wei YinDepartment of Breast Surgery, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Yuan-Yuan LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Wei LiangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Quan-Feng ShaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Jiao XueDepartment of Breast Surgery, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Bei ZhuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Lin ZhengDepartment of Breast Surgery, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Wei-Xian ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0025-4476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical management of granulomatous lobular mastitis (GLM) requires balancing complete lesion excision with the preservation of breast aesthetics. While the chest wall perforator flap (CWPF) is a valuable volume replacement technique, its clinical adoption may be limited by the need for intraoperative handheld Doppler localization and specialized training. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a simplified CWPF reconstruction approach guided by multimodal preoperative imaging and performed without intraoperative handheld Doppler. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 80 patients diagnosed with GLM between January 2022 and May 2024. Patients were assigned to two groups: Group A (n=43) underwent extended mass resection followed by modified CWPF reconstruction without intraoperative handheld Doppler, while Group B (n=37) received conventional surgical therapy (simple lumpectomy, extended mass resection, or segmental mastectomy without reconstruction). Group A was managed via a multimodal imaging protocol: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for source vessel identification, computed tomography (CT) for skeletal landmark referencing, and ultrasound for surface marking, thereby eliminating the need for intraoperative handheld Doppler localization. Results: All CWPF flaps were harvested under preoperative imaging guidance without the use of a handheld Doppler device. Postoperative complication rate was comparable between groups, mainly involving delayed wound healing, positive bacterial culture, subcutaneous fat liquefaction, incision infection, nipple-areola ischemic necrosis, ecchymosis, or hematoma (all P>0.05). Notably, Group A achieved significantly superior cosmetic outcomes compared with Group B (P<0.001). Patients in Group A also reported improved quality of life and higher patient satisfaction (P<0.001). Conclusions: Precise preoperative planning using multimodal imaging (MRI, CT, ultrasound) enables safe and effective CWPF reconstruction without intraoperative handheld Doppler in GLM surgery. This streamlined approach maintains surgical precision and favorable aesthetic outcomes while potentially reducing dependence on additional intraoperative localization devices, and may represent a practical strategy for breast reconstruction in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

chest wall perforator flap (CWPF)Granulomatous lobular mastitis (GLM)multimodal imagingpartial breast reconstructionresource-limited settings

Identifiers

PMID42591730
PMCPMC13462774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.