ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026
Clinical expertise shifts psychological distancing from effortful regulation to reduced engagement on internally oriented processing during multitasking.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical decision-making often occurs under conditions of high cognitive load, emotional stress, and time pressure. Psychological distancing, an emotion-focused coping strategy involving the mental separation of oneself from emotionally stressful situations to reduce affective impact, supports affect regulation in such contexts; however, its neural implementation during realistic multitasking and the extent to which it is shaped by clinical expertise remain poorly understood. Methods: We investigated the neural correlates of psychological distancing during high-risk multitasking clinical scenarios in experienced nurses and nursing students. Participants first completed immersive virtual reality simulations of realistic clinical situations, followed by an auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging task derived from the same scenarios. Psychological distancing was assessed using a validated self-report measure, and brain-behavior associations were examined separately for experienced nurses and nursing students. Results: Although self-reported psychological distancing did not differ between groups, clear expertise-related neural differences were observed. In experienced nurses, higher distancing was associated with reduced activation in regions of the default mode network, including the angular gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, and precuneus, which are implicated in internally oriented cognitive and emotional processing. In contrast, nursing students exhibited increased activation restricted to the cerebellum, suggesting greater dependence on effortful and compensatory neural mechanisms during emotion regulation under multitasking demands. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence that clinical expertise may influence the neural implementation of psychological distancing, shifting it from effortful regulation toward reduced engagement of internally oriented processing, which may reflect a more automatized regulatory implementation. This neural process may support adaptive emotion regulation during decision-making under stress, highlighting a potential neurobehavioral mechanism through which expertise shapes performance in complex clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.