ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and immune checkpoint inhibitor response in gastrointestinal liver metastases: current evidence and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver metastasis is associated with reduced benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in several gastrointestinal cancers, yet the background liver status is rarely considered in immunotherapy biomarker studies. Here, we examine whether metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) may alter the immune environment of liver metastases and affect ICI efficacy. The available evidence is strongest, and most mechanistic, for colorectal liver metastasis and derives largely from preclinical models; it is emerging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and limited for gastric and biliary tract cancers. MASLD and MASH should not be treated as interchangeable: simple steatosis, active steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis represent distinct liver conditions with different possible effects on hepatic seeding and immune-cell access. Early steatohepatitic inflammation may promote hepatic colonization through lipid availability, hepatocyte stress, and myeloid-cell recruitment, whereas advanced fibrosis can reduce initial colonization while impairing lymphocyte access to established lesions. ICI efficacy requires viable tumor-reactive T cells, relief from myeloid-cell suppression, and direct tumor-T-cell contact; MASLD- and MASH-related liver changes may interfere with each of these requirements through mechanisms beyond checkpoint-ligand expression alone. We distinguish T-cell exhaustion from liver metastasis-associated T-cell deletion, and highlight macrophage-mediated elimination of tumor-specific CD8-positive T cells, myeloid chemokine signaling-driven suppressor-cell recruitment, and stromal remodeling as candidate mechanisms, supported mainly by preclinical evidence, that may reduce ICI response. These mechanisms remain unvalidated as predictors of ICI response in cohorts with MASLD/MASH staging. Future studies should assess liver fat, inflammatory activity, fibrosis stage, tumor genotype, and ICI outcomes in the same patients to test whether MASLD/MASH stage is associated with differential benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.