Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591596›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Primary care2026

Weight status and pathways to eating disorder referral from primary care in England and Northern Ireland: a cross-sectional analysis of routine care data.

Chloe Gao, Jessica Wilkins, Alex Dregan, Karina L Allen, Jamie Scuffell, Ulrike Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chloe GaoCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jessica WilkinsCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Alex DreganDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Karina L AllenCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jamie ScuffellDepartment of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Ulrike SchmidtCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a need to understand how weight status influences access to eating disorder services. We aimed to examine characteristics of adults with eating disorder diagnoses in primary care settings in England and Northern Ireland and to assess the association between weight status and referral to specialist eating disorder services. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of electronic health records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum, which includes general practices in England and Northern Ireland, with an observation period of Jan 1, 2010, to Dec 31, 2023. We included people aged 18-80 years with at least one eating disorder diagnosis with or without an eating disorder referral, and excluded people with only an eating disorder referral without an eating disorder diagnosis. All data were extracted from CPRD Aurum except Index of Multiple Deprivation, which was extracted from the UK Office of National Statistics. To examine the association between the primary exposure of weight status (ie, with underweight Findings: 35 404 people with at least one eating disorder diagnosis aged 18-80 years were included in our analysis, of whom 26 822 (75·8%) did not receive an eating disorder referral. Most people identified as White (29 545 [83·5%] of 35 404), followed by Asian (2154 [6·1%]), unknown (1325 [3·7%]), Black (1028 [2·9%]), mixed/multiple (682 [1·9%]), and other (110 [0·3%]). There were 28 944 (81·8%) female individuals and 6460 (18·2%) male individuals. The interaction term between anorexia nervosa diagnosis and underweight was positively associated with receiving an eating disorder referral (odds ratio 4·05 [95% CI 3·54-4·63]; p<0·0001). The interaction term between having an avoidant restrictive food intake disorder diagnosis and underweight was not statistically significant (0·84 [0·53-1·32]; p=0·54). Similarly, the interaction term between having a binge eating disorder diagnosis and underweight was not statistically significant (0·62 [0·10-3·88]; p=0·61). The interaction terms between having an eating disorder diagnosis and underweight for bulimia nervosa (0·76 [0·64-0·90]; p=0·0018), other specified feeding or eating disorder (0·76 [0·64-0·90]; p=0·0018), and generic eating disorder (0·72 [0·65-0·80]; p<0·0001) were negatively associated with receiving an eating disorder referral. Interpretation: Findings from this analysis indicate that people in England and Northern Ireland might encounter barriers to accessing eating disorder treatment within the National Health Service, where specialist care often requires General Practitioner referral. Disparities in eating disorder referral by diagnosis indicate a need to improve recognition of eating disorders beyond anorexia nervosa. Funding: Medical Research Council, Arts and Humanities Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, and the UK National Institute of Health Research.

Identifiers

PMID42591596
PMCPMC13462336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.