Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591573›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2026

Independent surrogacy journeys without agency intervention: an ethnographic study of surrogates' experiences.

Nancy Anne Konvalinka, Ariadna Ayala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nancy Anne KonvalinkaDepartment of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia UNED, Madrid, Spain.
Ariadna AyalaDepartment of Social Anthropology and Social Psychology, School of Political Science and Sociology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The research presented inquires into how women in the United States who act as surrogates independently, without using agencies, to help others form their families organize, experience, and understand these independent journeys. Based on ethnographic interviews with ten white, middle-class U.S. women, this article analyzes their choice to undertake independent (non-agency directed) surrogacy journeys in the United States, a subject which has received little specific attention in the literature. Data from in-depth interviews regarding the decision to carry out an independent surrogacy, the knowledge necessary to do so, the lived experience of the journey itself, the relationship between the surrogate and the intended parents in the years afterwards, and the perceived pros and cons of independent journeys (including cases in which the women used an agency in later surrogacies) will be presented. Our findings, which document all the steps of the surrogacy journey, show that these women carry out extensive research into all the aspects of the process, making informed decisions throughout. The further election of these women to entrepreneurialize their experience and work in the sector of assisted reproduction and surrogacy will also be considered. We conclude that these women's desire and capacity to control, themselves, the complexity of the medical, legal, economic, relational, and emotional aspects of the surrogacy journey, maintaining their autonomy, lead them to prefer an independent surrogacy journey for themselves, while informing other women of the pros and cons of this type of journey.

Indexed as

autonomyentrepreneurshipethnographyfeminismindependent surrogacy journeyreproductionsurrogacy

Identifiers

PMID42591573
PMCPMC13462515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.