ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Institutional barriers to assisted reproductive technology access in rural South Africa: a qualitative study of medical officers' perspectives.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Access to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) remains highly unequal globally, with rural populations facing significant geographic, financial, and institutional barriers to fertility care. In South Africa, despite constitutional guarantees of access to reproductive healthcare, advanced fertility services remain concentrated in urban centres and the private healthcare sector, limiting access for many rural communities. Methods: This qualitative study explored institutional barriers to ART access from the perspectives of medical officers working in the uMhlabuyalingana Local Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 medical officers and analysed using thematic analysis. Institutional Theory provided the conceptual lens through which findings were interpreted. Results: Three major themes emerged from the analysis: (1) limited scope of infertility management in rural healthcare facilities, constrained by infrastructure, personnel, and resource limitations; (2) inadequate patient and provider education, resulting in low fertility awareness and delayed care-seeking; and (3) weak health system capacity, characterised by fragmented referral pathways, workforce shortages, and limited access to specialised fertility services. Participants described how these barriers collectively restrict the availability, accessibility, and continuity of infertility care for rural populations. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that inequitable access to ART in rural South Africa is shaped not only by geographic distance but also by broader institutional arrangements that systematically disadvantage rural communities. Strengthening health system capacity, decentralising selected fertility services, improving referral systems, and integrating infertility education into primary healthcare are critical steps toward advancing reproductive justice and achieving equitable access to reproductive healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.