ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Seedling emergence of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Seeds of Methods: Seeds were stored without artificial cooling at ambient temperature (mean 34 °C) for 0, 2, 4 or 6 weeks, reflecting the resource constrained conditions of smallholder nurseries in West Africa. The experiment followed a completely randomized design with 8 treatments (2 collection conditions × 4 storage durations), each replicated 3 times (720 seeds). Emergence was monitored daily for 30 days and analyzed using beta regression (with the Smithson-Verkuilen transformation) for the final emergence proportion and a Cox proportional-hazards model, complemented by Kaplan-Meier estimation and log-rank tests, for emergence dynamics. Results: Storage duration strongly affected emergence (p< 0.001), with a marked decline beyond two weeks. Freshly collected seeds reached the highest final emergence proportion (0.844). Two week-stored seeds reached about 0.55, and seeds stored for four or six weeks showed no emergence. The Kaplan-Meier emergence probability stabilized at 84.4% by day 14 for fresh seeds and at 55% by day 28 for two week-stored seeds. Collection condition affected emergence in a storage-dependent way, with a significant storage × collection interaction (p< 0.001). Canopy-collected seeds emerged more than ground-collected seeds when fresh (p = 0.004). After two weeks, the ranking reversed and ground-collected seeds emerged more (p = 0.008). Discussion and conclusion: These results indicate that storage duration under ambient tropical conditions, rather than soil contact during early post-dispersal, governs the rapid loss of emergence capacity. This loss is consistent with the desiccation and temperature-sensitive behavior previously reported for this presumed recalcitrant species, although no physiological marker was measured here. We establish a practical two-week emergence threshold for seed sourcing, nursery management and forest restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.