ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2026
A proposal for selecting appropriate intersegmental plane identification methods based on tumor characteristics in thoracoscopic segmentectomy.
Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying the intersegmental plane (ISP) of the target segment is a key step in anatomical segmentectomy. Although multiple methods are available for ISP identification, the most appropriate approach for segmentectomy remains unclear. Traditionally, intersegmental veins or inflation-deflation lines have been used to demarcate the ISP. In the last decade, near-infrared fluorescence imaging combined with intravenous indocyanine green (ICG) injection has become widely used for ISP identification. More recently, an original method using the concave portion of the apical visceral pleura has been introduced as a simple ISP demarcation approach in patients undergoing anterior or apical segmentectomy. Small tumors indicated for segmentectomy have distinct computed tomography (CT) and intraoperative characteristics, such as ground-glass opacity, solid nodules, and features indicating whether the tumor location is detectable or undetectable during surgery. Thus, ISP identification methods should be selected according to these tumor characteristics. In sublobar resection, securing an adequate surgical margin is essential to avoid cancer recurrence. Specifically, determining whether the tumor location is detectable or undetectable during surgery is vital for ensuring an adequate surgical margin. Therefore, in segmentectomy for detectable tumors, approximate ISP identification can be achieved via the ICG method or simple demarcation of apical structures on the lung, because the distance from the tumor can be confirmed to ensure an adequate surgical margin. Conversely, segmentectomy for undetectable tumors requires more precise ISP identification using a combination of the ICG method, intersegmental vein demarcation, and inflation-deflation. In summary, the appropriate combination of intersegmental identification methods should be selected based on specific tumor characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.