Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591476›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Trust-driven consensus reaching in human-AI hybrid large-scale group decision-making.

Xinyu Wang, Xuanhua Xu, Weiwei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinyu WangSchool of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha, China.
Xuanhua XuSchool of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha, China.
Weiwei ZhangSchool of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To address the issues of insufficient trust representation, lack of feedback in opinion conflicts, and low consensus convergence efficiency in human-AI hybrid group decision-making, this paper proposes a trust-driven consensus-reaching method for human-AI collaborative decision-making. Methods: Centered on trust modeling, the proposed method integrates human experts and large language models into a unified collaborative framework. By constructing dynamic trust relationships among multiple agents, it realizes the coupled evolution of trust mechanisms and opinion dynamics. Furthermore, a differentiated opinion updating mechanism is designed based on trust propagation, and combined with consensus measurement and feedback regulation to form an iterative process from initial opinions to a stable consensus solution. Results: Based on the Zhengzhou "7.20" rainstorm case, and in comparison with traditional weight adjustment methods and dynamic regulation methods based on deep reinforcement learning, the proposed method preliminarily validates its potential advantages in the above indicators. Discussion: Under the conditions of this case, the proposed method exhibits a trend of achieving higher consensus quality with lower intervention costs.

Indexed as

decision consensushuman-AI collaborationhuman-AI collectivehuman-AI trustlarge language model

Identifiers

PMID42591476
PMCPMC13461716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.