ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2026
Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection with the da Vinci Xi surgical system: technical modifications and practical guidance.
Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-RATS) lung resection using the daVinci Xi surgical system combines the advantages of robotic surgery, namely, superior articulated dexterity of instruments and high-definition three-dimensional (3D) visualization, with the benefits of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS), which is characterized by minimal chest wall disruption and accelerated recovery through minimized postoperative pain. This novel approach utilizes a single 4-cm incision at the 5th or 6th intercostal space near the midaxillary line for the camera and two instrument arms. With respect to arm placement, we adopted the cross-arm technique after gaining experience with the original parallel technique, thereby minimizing physical interference between the robotic arms. In U-RATS, because the bedside surgeon faces limitations in maintaining surgical field visibility, the console surgeon must actively clear the field. This is achieved using both robotic arms to hold gauze rolls, thereby enabling efficient dissection via the "hot tearing" technique with SynchroSeal. For lung resection, while robotic staplers are an option, manual staplers combined with reinforcement material are preferred, particularly for patients with interstitial lung disease or emphysema. Because the use of manual staplers in U-RATS lung resection limits the robotic system to a single-arm retraction, the silk loop technique is highly effective for vascular and bronchial traction in such scenarios. During the initial implementation phase, a caudal port should be added for dual-portal RATS if stapler insertion becomes challenging. Technical proficiency can be established through dry lab training and by analyzing overhead video footage. With a proper setup and mastery of these specialized maneuvers, U-RATS offers a safe and reproducible minimally invasive procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.