Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591446›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Improvement and evaluation of the 50th percentile female prototype rear impact dummy, BioRID P50F.

Anna Carlsson, Johan Davidsson, Mats Y Svensson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna CarlssonChalmers Industriteknik, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johan DavidssonVehicle Safety Division, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mats Y SvenssonVehicle Safety Division, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whiplash injuries due to rear impact vehicle collisions remain a significant global concern, with females facing a disproportionately higher risk of permanent medical impairment compared to males. Current rear impact testing predominantly uses 50th percentile male dummies, such as the BioRID II, which are not representative of the female population. A 50th percentile male dummy roughly corresponds to a 90th-95th percentile female in stature and mass, which appear to render whiplash protection systems less effective for women. In preparation for future investigation of car models with known differences in whiplash injury risk between female and male occupants, the development of an upgraded average size female BioRID prototype, denoted P50F_V2, was initiated to further improve the first female BioRID prototype. The aim was to better represent female properties by reducing upper torso stiffness and improving spinal curvature, as well as simplifying the H-point position measurement and refining the external contours of the head, hands and feet. The dynamic response of the upgraded prototype was evaluated with regard to rear impact sled tests, comprising female volunteers close to the 50th percentile female size. Overall, the dynamic response of the upgraded prototype showed improvements, in particular, the T1 rearward angular displacement better matched the female volunteer response corridors. Although the biofidelity of the upgraded prototype leaves room for further improvement, it is deemed sufficient to provide an understanding of the differences in dynamic response between female and male occupants in rear impacts. Overall, the upgraded BioRID P50F, used as a complement to the BioRID II, is a significant step towards sex-inclusive crash testing.

Indexed as

crash test dummyfemalesrear impactsled testingsoft tissue neck injuryvehicle safetyWADwhiplash

Identifiers

PMID42591446
PMCPMC13462242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.