Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591414›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026

Limited Australian clinical guidelines for pain assessment in hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment: implications for safe and quality care.

Rosemary Saunders, Kaoru Nosaka, Seng Giap Marcus Ang, Natasya Raja Azlan, Aaron Alejandro, Rohini Sharma Bhardwaj, Olivia Gallagher, Irene Ngune, Amineh Rashidi, Yan Hui Celestine Wee and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rosemary SaundersCentre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Kaoru NosakaCentre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Seng Giap Marcus AngCentre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Natasya Raja AzlanCentre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Aaron AlejandroCentre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Rohini Sharma BhardwajCentre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Olivia GallagherSchool of Health & Clinical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Irene NguneCentre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Amineh RashidiSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Yan Hui Celestine WeeAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Nilufeur McKayCentre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pain assessment remains challenging in healthcare settings in patients who are unable to self-report their pain. More than 50% of individuals with dementia and other forms of cognitive impairment (CI) experience pain daily. However, pain is frequently overlooked and inadequately assessed by healthcare professionals due to their lack of knowledge and guidelines to inform pain assessment. Pain is also a leading cause of hospital presentation and inappropriate pain assessment can impact on pain management and compromise safe and quality care. Evidence-based guidelines that inform appropriate pain assessment and management are therefore essential. This scoping review aimed to explore pain assessment guidelines for patients with CI in hospital through an Australian focused search to inform pain assessment practice within our local context and subsequent research. The objectives were to identify accessible pain assessment guidelines for hospitalized older adults with CI and summarize and describe their characteristics. Methods: A scoping review was conducted, using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR reporting framework. The search strategy was guided by the Population, Concept, and Context frameworks, focusing on older adults with CI, pain assessment guidelines, and hospital or acute care setting. The search was conducted in March 2026, using CINHAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google, Yahoo Search, and Bing. Results: No Australian guidelines were located in the database search. Of 56 guidelines identified through internet searches, nine met the inclusion criteria and were included in data extraction. All nine included pain assessment indication; however, two provided no practical guidance, and the remaining seven offered only brief narrative descriptions of pain assessment steps. The most frequently recommended pain assessment tools in the guidelines for patients with CI were the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia and the Abbey Pain Scale. Discussion: By systematically mapping the extent, characteristics, and variability of guidelines for pain assessment of patients with CI guidelines, it is an important first step in driving innovation in pain assessment for older adults in Australia. It provides transferable insights that can inform the development and adaptation of international clinical guidelines. Scoping Review Registration (OSF):https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HJSMZ.

Indexed as

clinical practice guidelinescognitive impairmentdementiahospitalnursespain assessmentsafety and qualityscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42591414
PMCPMC13461886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.