ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Artificial intelligence for dental caries diagnosis: translating algorithms to clinical practice.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental caries remains the most prevalent chronic disease worldwide, affecting more than two billion people and driving substantial healthcare costs. While early detection is central to minimally invasive dentistry, traditional diagnostic methods suffer from limited sensitivity and high inter-examiner variability, especially for incipient lesions. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has shown promise in overcoming these limitations, and many studies have reported expert-level performance under controlled conditions. However, a substantial translational gap persists between algorithmic success in silico and reliable performance in real-world clinical environments. This review synthesizes the full development pipeline of AI for caries diagnosis-from data curation and ground-truth construction to model design, validation, and clinical deployment. We highlight persistent bottlenecks including domain shift across imaging devices and clinical settings, subjective and inconsistent annotation practices, limited multimodal datasets, and heterogeneous reporting standards. Emerging strategies such as multi-center data collection, probabilistic labeling, self-supervised learning, domain adaptation, and test-time augmentation offer partial solutions but remain underutilized. We argue for a paradigm shift from binary detection toward quantitative, risk-based staging that aligns with minimally invasive dentistry and the WHO Global Oral Health Action Plan 2023-2030. By advocating for standardized multimodal datasets, rigorous external validation, explainable interfaces, and human-centered clinical integration, this review outlines a roadmap for translating AI innovation into trustworthy, equitable, and clinically meaningful decision-support systems capable of reducing the global burden of untreated caries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.