ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelic in the knee: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica (DEH) is a rare congenital bone dysplasia characterized by overgrowth of the epiphyseal cartilage on one side, with its etiology remaining unclear. The condition predominantly affects weight-bearing joints of the lower limbs, typically presenting with localized pain due to a rapidly growing mass around the joint. In severe cases, symptoms such as limb length discrepancy and limb deformity may occur. Early diagnosis is challenging, and delayed diagnosis and treatment can easily lead to limb deformity and functional impairment. Case presentation: This paper reports the case of a 9-year-old male patient who was initially misdiagnosed with osteochondritis dissecans of the medial femoral condyle at a community hospital. After two months of immobilization and rest without improvement in pain, he was referred to our hospital, where the diagnosis was revised to DEH. We performed an open surgical excision of the lesion, and postoperative histopathological examination confirmed DEH. At 3-month follow-up, the patient had resumed normal walking. At 6-month follow-up showed complete resolution of pain and restoration of normal knee joint range of motion. At 2-year follow-up, there were no signs of recurrence, and knee function had recovered well. Conclusion: DEH is a rare condition that is prone to misdiagnosis. Establishing a correct diagnosis early requires a combination of clinical presentation, imaging studies and histopathological findings. This case suggests that DEH should be considered in pediatric knee lesions mimicking osteochondritis dissecans, and that complete excision can achieve good outcomes in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.