ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Construction and validation of a sepsis prediction model using inflammatory and hemodynamic markers in the emergency department.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an early diagnosis prediction model for sepsis in the emergency department by integrating inflammatory, hemodynamic, and nursing assessment indicators. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 320 patients with suspected infection admitted to our hospital was enrolled. Participants were randomly allocated into a training set and a validation set at a 7:3 ratio. Key variables were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Subsequently, logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machine models were constructed. Model performance and interpretability were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. Results: LASSO regression identified three core variables: procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS). Multivariate analysis revealed that all three were independent risk factors ( Conclusion: The integrated model developed in this study exhibits moderate to satisfactory predictive performance and clinical utility. It may act as a candidate bedside risk-stratification tool pending further external multicenter validation for emergency nursing sepsis screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.