ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Transforming quality use of medicines in Saudi Arabia: physician perspectives on electronic prescribing systems.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electronic prescribing (EP) systems are now a core component of hospital healthcare in Saudi Arabia (SA), aiming to enhance patient safety and streamline complex clinical workflows. There is, however, limited evidence on how physicians in large government hospitals that use multiple prescribing platforms view these systems in daily practice, as most prior research has focused on primary care or on single academic centres. This study aimed to evaluate physicians' perspectives on the effectiveness and efficiency of EP systems across multiple government hospitals in a major Saudi city and to identify key advantages and obstacles associated with their use. Methods: A cross-sectional survey, adapted from validated international tools, was conducted in March 2025 among physicians in seven government hospitals. The questionnaire comprised four sections: demographics, efficiency (18 items), effectiveness (10 items), and open-ended questions on perceived advantages and challenges. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics to summarise responses, Pearson's chi-squared test to examine associations between variables, and thematic analysis for free-text comments. Results: A total of 167 physicians completed the survey; most were male (82.6%), and nearly half were general practitioners (46.1%). Overall satisfaction with EP systems was high, with respondents reporting perceived improvements in workflow efficiency (79.0%), patient safety (91.0%), error reduction (91.0%), and guideline adherence (86.8%). Mean scores on a five-point scale were 4.30 (SD = 0.82) for efficiency and 4.59 (SD = 0.71) for effectiveness. Efficiency scores were significantly associated with physician gender ( Conclusion: Physicians in Saudi government hospitals generally view EP systems as beneficial, helping to streamline workflows, enhance patient safety, and support evidence-based practice. Nevertheless, technical issues, training gaps, and workflow disruptions indicate that these systems are not yet operating at full potential. Addressing these challenges through targeted training, infrastructure upgrades, and improved interprofessional communication is essential to maximise the benefits of digital prescribing and align with international best practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.