ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2026
From congress to journal: publication outcomes of oral scientific presentations at the European society of urogenital radiology congresses.
Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Publication of congress presentations as full-text articles is an indirect indicator of scientific productivity and research quality. This study evaluated publication outcomes of oral scientific presentations delivered at European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) congresses and descriptively explored variation according to presentation characteristics. Methods: This retrospective bibliometric study included oral scientific presentations delivered at ESUR congresses between 2017 and 2022, excluding the canceled 2020 meeting. Poster presentations, invited lectures, educational sessions, and non-scientific sessions were excluded to maintain consistency with recent radiology congress publication studies. Presentations already published as full-text articles before the corresponding congress were excluded from the subsequent-publication denominator and reported separately. Publication status was determined by systematic PubMed/MEDLINE searches. The primary outcome was subsequent publication as a PubMed/MEDLINE-indexed full-text original research article by the final search date. Results: Among 183 oral presentations, 22 had been published before the corresponding congress and two were classified as ambiguous congress-month publications. After exclusion of pre-congress publications, 161 presentations were eligible for the main subsequent-publication analysis. During full available follow-up, 79 presentations were subsequently published, corresponding to a publication proportion of 49.1% (95% CI, 41.1-57.0%). The median time to publication was 12.9 months, and 69 of 79 subsequent publications (87.3%) appeared within 36 months. Conclusions: ESUR oral scientific presentations showed a subsequent publication proportion comparable to contemporary European radiology congresses. The use of oral-only inclusion, exclusion of pre-congress publications, and PubMed/MEDLINE-based publication matching aligns this study with recent ECR, ESGAR, and ESNR publication-outcome analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.