Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591303›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026

Circulating tumor cells as biomarkers in melanoma: techniques, challenges, and clinical applications.

Elisabetta Broseghini, Giorgio Durante, Alessia Soru, Francesca Bianchi, Francesca Comito, Emi Dika, Manuela Ferracin, Giulia Gallerani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elisabetta Broseghini *IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giorgio Durante *IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessia SoruDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca BianchiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca ComitoIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Emi DikaIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Manuela Ferracin *IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giulia Gallerani *IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous melanoma is a malignant tumor and remains a clinical challenge due to unmet needs in risk stratification, real-time treatment monitoring, and early detection of progression or resistance. Early detection is crucial, as prognosis significantly worsens once metastasis occurs. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a powerful, minimally invasive tool for early diagnosis, real-time disease monitoring, and therapeutic guidance. Among its components, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are rare yet clinically informative, providing insights into tumor heterogeneity, metastatic potential, and prognosis. Given its high heterogeneity, melanoma could particularly benefit from CTC analysis to inform personalized treatment strategies and improve clinical outcomes. Quantification of melanoma CTCs remains limited by low abundance and heterogeneity, as well as the lack of standardized isolation methods across laboratories. This review summarizes current methods for melanoma CTC detection and isolation. It also explores the clinical significance of melanoma CTCs, addressing the challenges and future opportunities for their implementation in clinical practice.

Indexed as

biomarkersCTCcutaneous melanomaliquid biopsyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID42591303
PMCPMC13461721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.