ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Quantifying spectral information and redundancy in high-dimensional personality taxonomies: an entropy-based approach.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Personality assessment involves the collection and organization of information into multidimensional taxonomies. However, no routinely used index directly quantifies the amount of information encoded in such taxonomies. Effective dimensionality (ED) is a Shannon entropy-based metric that uses eigenvalue distributions to quantify a system's spectral information as the effective number of non-redundant components. Although ED has been applied across fields ranging from physics to political science, it remains underutilized in psychological assessment. Methods: After establishing an interpretive framework through Monte Carlo simulation, we applied ED to quantify informational content and redundancy across five widely used taxonomies of normal and pathological personality in large community and clinical samples ( Results: On average, domains conveyed 21% less spectral information than their nominal dimensionality implies, and facets 45% less, reflecting substantial trait overlap. Across levels, items contained 9- to 31-fold greater spectral information than domains, reflecting both specific variance and measurement error. Although residualized facets and items contained unique variance that predicted clinically relevant life outcomes, gains did not reach significance under stringent out-of-sample comparisons. In factor analysis, ED quantified factor redundancy across rotation methods, with oblique rotations producing up to 25% less spectral information. ED also informed cutoff calibration to mitigate the curse of dimensionality-which can artifactually inflate disorder rates in high-dimensional systems-maintaining prevalence estimates within 1-15% of target levels under multivariate normality. Conclusion: ED provides a model-agnostic, continuous index for quantifying spectral information, structural redundancy, and complexity in multidimensional psychological systems. However, it does not necessarily coincide with psychologically meaningful information. ED may support the development of informationally parsimonious taxonomies and well-calibrated diagnostic thresholds in high-dimensional personality assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.