ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Communication successes, challenges, and needs among extension and outreach professionals engaging small-scale and non-intensive swine farmers.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An introduction of a foreign animal disease (FAD) could greatly harm the United States' (U.S.) swine industry and cost billions of dollars in losses. Private and public stakeholders have invested heavily in the development of programs to educate swine producers about FAD threats, but their reach to small-scale and non-intensive farmers may be limited. In the U.S., there is a significant contingent of farmers that fall under a wide variety of farm practices, such as small-scale, pasture-raised, and homesteaders. We postulate that research and outreach with these farmers poses unique challenges compared to intensive farmers. To enhance our research-based perspective, agricultural extensionists and educators from 11 U.S. states were interviewed (17 interviewees across 15 interviews) on their experiences working with this audience. Their practice-based perspectives were gathered on the challenges, successes, and ongoing needs of both producers and extension/education professionals. Major challenges included finding this widely dispersed audience, creating engaging materials applicable to diverse production methods and experience, and building relationships with communities that may be distrusting of outside organizations and professionals. Success was found through taking time to listen, adopting communication and education approaches that match specific audience needs, working with trusted partners, and integrating FAD content into broader animal husbandry topics. Ongoing needs include investment of funding and time from industry partners, more personnel, updated educational materials, and a format for broader collaboration. This perspective highlights the needs and opportunities to enhance preparedness and awareness of small-scale and non-intensive swine farming, with the ultimate objective of contributing to mitigate the impact of hypothetical FAD incursions into the U.S.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.