ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Dietary spermidine intake is not associated with prostate cancer incidence or prostate cancer-specific mortality: findings from the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The role of dietary spermidine in prostate cancer outcomes remains unclear. We examined associations between spermidine intake and prostate cancer incidence, all-cause mortality, and prostate cancer-specific mortality in a large prospective cohort. Methods: This study included 54,517 male participants from the PLCO cancer screening trial. Spermidine in the diet was assessed through a food frequency questionnaire. Incidence was assessed using logistic regression, all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazards models, and prostate cancer-specific mortality using Fine-Gray competing risk models. Multivariable models adjusted for available demographic, lifestyle, and clinical covariates; total energy intake was not included because it could not be reliably calculated from the processed analytic dataset. Results: During the follow-up period, a total of 6,643 cases of prostate cancer and 603 cases of prostate cancer-related deaths were observed. The intake of spermidine was not associated with the incidence of prostate cancer (the relative risk value between the highest quintile and the lowest quintile was 1.00, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.89-1.12). A non-linear inverse association was observed in terms of all-cause mortality (non-linear Conclusion: Dietary spermidine intake is not associated with prostate cancer incidence or prostate cancer-specific mortality. The observed inverse association with all-cause mortality may reflect residual confounding. These findings are hypothesis-generating and do not support clinical or dietary recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.