ReviewFrontiers in neurology
Cerebrospinal fluid dysregulation and post-traumatic hydrocephalus after paediatric traumatic brain injury.
Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-traumatic hydrocephalus after paediatric traumatic brain injury is commonly framed as a delayed structural complication, yet the clinical literature indicates that this model is incomplete. Across paediatric neurocritical care and imaging studies, traumatic injury was associated with disturbed cerebrovascular autoregulation, impaired intracranial compliance, altered cerebral perfusion pressure targets, abnormal cerebrovascular reactivity, oxygenation abnormalities, and evolving glymphatic or perivascular changes. Normative paediatric studies likewise showed that cerebrospinal fluid physiology is developmentally dynamic, with age-dependent variation in aqueductal and spinal flow, glymphatic-associated indices, craniospinal compliance, and the relationship between brain and cerebrospinal fluid volumes. Together, these observations support the hypothesis that paediatric post-traumatic hydrocephalus may, in some patients, represent a downstream clinical expression of disturbed cerebrospinal fluid and intracranial fluid homeostasis, rather than a purely structural disorder of obstruction or absorption failure. The most direct clinical evidence came from infusion-study data in post-traumatic ventriculomegaly, in which resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow was higher in shunted cases, compliance was reduced, and structural imaging alone did not reliably distinguish probable hydrocephalus from ex vacuo ventricular enlargement. However, direct paediatric studies of incidence, physiology-based classification, and treatment selection remain limited. Current evidence supports consideration of a physiology-informed reframing of post-traumatic hydrocephalus, while also underscoring the need for longitudinal paediatric studies that link acute disturbances in cerebrospinal fluid dynamics with delayed ventriculomegaly, treatment response, and neurodevelopmental outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.