Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591175›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Rapid resolution of guttate psoriasis with upadacitinib: a case report.

Zenan Tang, Xiaoyang Liu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zenan TangDepartment of Dermatology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyang LiuDepartment of Dermatology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a 30-year-old woman with acute, severe, and intensely pruritic Guttate Psoriasis (GP) who experienced a rapid and marked response to the oral selective JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib. The patient presented with a 20-day history of rapidly spreading, intensely pruritic lesions after an upper respiratory infection, with a mildly elevated antistreptolysin O titer but no clinical or laboratory evidence of ongoing active infection. Notably, although she had previously responded well to secukinumab, an IL-17A inhibitor, the current flare occurred just 1 week after a scheduled injection. Conventional therapies, including antihistamines, topical steroids, and narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, failed to control either disease progression or the debilitating pruritus. Histopathological examination revealed epidermal hyperkeratosis with parakeratosis, acanthosis, elongation and downward extension of the rete ridges, dilated capillaries in the papillary dermis, and scattered lymphocytic infiltration, supporting the diagnosis of guttate psoriasis. After active infection had been excluded, upadacitinib 15 mg daily was initiated as an off-label rescue strategy. The patient reported significant pruritus relief within the first 24 h. After 2 weeks of treatment, near-complete clearance of skin lesions was achieved, and the patient completed a total of 28 days of upadacitinib therapy, resulting in complete resolution of the eruption. She subsequently underwent tonsillectomy, and no recurrence was observed during 6 months of follow-up. This case suggests that short course upadacitinib may represent a valuable therapeutic option for severely pruritic GP when rapid disease control is needed, but only after active infection has been excluded with careful safety monitoring.

Indexed as

case reportguttate psoriasisintractable pruritusJAK1 inhibitionupadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID42591175
PMCPMC13461466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.