ArticleFrontiers in nephrology2026
Hepatitis E virus infection in kidney transplant recipients: a pilot cross-sectional study of serological markers and allograft function in Northern Serbia.
Article in Frontiers in nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an emerging cause of chronic hepatitis and extrahepatic disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Data on kidney transplant populations, particularly in endemic regions, remain limited. This pilot study aimed to quantify the prevalence of HEV exposure and active infection in kidney transplant recipients and examine associations between HEV markers and allograft function. Methods: In this single-centre cross-sectional pilot study, 25 adult kidney transplant recipients (mean age 48.9 ± 14.4 years, median 13.0 years post-transplant) with available HEV serology and/or RNA testing were included. Clinical data, liver enzymes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m²), and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio were obtained from medical records; allograft function was categorised as better versus worsening based on longitudinal clinical and laboratory trends documented in medical records. HEV exposure and active infection were assessed using anti-HEV IgG and IgM antibodies (Euroimmun ELISA; reactive ≥ 1.1, borderline 0.8-1.1, negative < 0.8) and HEV RNA in serum and stool. Results: Anti-HEV antibodies were present in 19/25 (76%) patients; HEV RNA was detected in 2/25 (8%) patients, with concurrent serum and stool positivity confirmed in both cases. eGFR data were available in 15 patients (60%). IgG serostatus was not associated with eGFR differences, but IgM-positive recipients had significantly lower eGFR (median 35.5 vs 57.5 mL/min/1.73 m²; p = 0.018; Cliff's δ = 0.74) and higher liver enzyme activity. In an exploratory regression model (n = 15), anti-HEV IgM positivity was associated with approximately 29.8 mL/min/1.73 m² lower eGFR (R² = 0.50), though this estimate is hypothesis-generating given the small sample. Anti-HEV IgM was the strongest individual predictor of worsening graft function (OR = 3.00; 95% CI 0.37-24.5). Conclusions: In this endemic setting, kidney transplant recipients showed high HEV seroprevalence and an exploratory association between IgM positivity and impaired allograft function. These hypothesis-generating findings support targeted HEV evaluation-including RNA testing-in kidney transplant recipients with unexplained graft dysfunction or mild transaminase elevation in an endemic South-Eastern European setting. Larger longitudinal studies with kidney biopsies are needed to define the renal impact of HEV and determine whether anti-HEV IgM may serve as a risk-stratification marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.