ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Investigation of the impact of pressurization coupled with eccentric resistance training on the explosive strength of the lower limbs in male college students specializing in sprinting.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the impact of eccentric exercise (ECC) training combined with blood flow restriction training (BFRT) on explosive power in the lower extremities. Sixteen collegiate sprinters were randomly allocated into two groups: the BFRT group, comprising eight male participants, and the ECC group, also consisting of eight men. Participants in the ECC group engaged in eccentric exercises thrice weekly for a duration of six weeks. Alongside the ECC training, participants in the BFRT group had a pressure cuff positioned on the proximal thigh, sustaining a pressure of 150 mmHg. Assessments were performed before and after training to examine hip joint strength, physical fitness (assessed through a 30-meter sprint and vertical jump), anaerobic capacity, and lower limb circumference. The findings indicated that both the ECC and BFRT groups displayed notable enhancements in the isokinetic strength of the hip extensors, with the BFRT group achieving superior results relative to the ECC group. Moreover, BFRT was observed to improve muscle strength on the non-dominant side, consequently diminishing strength asymmetry between both sides. Both training methods enhanced the leaping ability and speed of the collegiate sprinters; however, the BFRT group demonstrated superior efficacy in improving jumping performance. Furthermore, both groups enhanced anaerobic ability and the limb circumference of the lower limb muscles, with BFRT demonstrating more significant advantages than ECC alone. The data indicate that the regular integration of ECC training with BFRT results in superior improvements in lower limb explosiveness, anaerobic capacity, and muscular circumference compared to ECC training performed alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.