SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Oral health promotion in adults with type 2 diabetes-a scoping review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Individuals affected with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are always at higher risk for developing oral diseases. The current scoping review was undertaken to map the extent, range and nature of the recent evidence on oral-health promotion and prevention in adults with T2DM, focusing on patient awareness, provider practices, barriers to care, and preventive strategies. Methods: The review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework as refined by Levac et al. and is reported in line with the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, ProQuest and Google Scholar) were searched for peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2015 and 2025. Records were screened independently by two reviewers against pre-defined eligibility criteria; data were charted and synthesized narratively into themes aligned to the research questions. Results: Of 412 records identified, nine peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria. Three themes were identified: (i) associations between oral-hygiene practices, glycemic control and oral-health outcomes; (ii) patient knowledge and awareness of the diabetes-oral-health link; and (iii) healthcare-provider awareness and interprofessional collaboration. The evidence indicated that many patients are unaware of their increased oral-health risk and that oral-health guidance is inconsistently delivered by healthcare professionals however, where guidance was provided, oral-hygiene behaviors and outcomes were improved. Conclusions: Within the limits of the current study, it could be concluded that oral health is under-addressed in T2DM care and that patient awareness and interprofessional referral pathways are frequently inadequate. These findings support the need for coordinated, evidence-based oral-health promotion within diabetes management and for higher-quality primary studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.