ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
Learning faults in time: sequential behavioural modelling for complex fault detection in multi-robot systems.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable fault detection in multi-robot systems requires models capable of capturing complex, time-dependent fault signatures that manifest over extended temporal horizons rather than instantaneous observations alone. Existing data-driven approaches operate reactively on behavioural snapshots, failing to capture fault modes whose discriminative signature depends on temporally ordered precursors. This work formalises a theoretical impossibility result demonstrating that memoryless classifiers are provably insufficient, and presents a Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) model operating on generic, primitive behavioural features to learn these latent temporal dependencies without domain-specific priors. Two complex fault types are evaluated: progressive actuator degradation and intermittent actuator dropout, each paired with a distinct swarm movement pattern representing varying levels of temporal complexity. Experimental results demonstrate that sequential models are essential when the fault signature is defined by ordered precursors, while memoryless models partially suffice for simpler temporal structures. Compute benchmarks confirm real-time feasibility for distributed onboard deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.