ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
Hybrid artificial intelligence framework for patient emotion recognition in dentistry.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emotional communication plays an important role in dentist-patient interactions, yet domain-specific resources for automated emotion recognition in dental consultations remain limited. Objective: This study aimed to develop an emotional dental consultation corpus derived from restorative dentistry consultations and to evaluate a hybrid artificial intelligence (AI) framework for automated patient emotion recognition. Methods: Audio recordings from 12 restorative dentistry consultations were transcribed and segmented into patient utterances. A total of 2,160 utterances were independently annotated into six emotion categories (Neutral, Fear, Sad, Happy, Angry, and Disgust) by three trained annotators using a standardized annotation framework. Inter-annotator reliability was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. The resulting corpus was used to train a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) classifier and transformer-based baseline models, including BERT and RoBERTa. A hybrid framework was developed by applying large language model (LLM)-based confidence re-ranking to low-confidence BiLSTM predictions. Three open-source LLMs (Llama 3.1, DeepSeek-R1, and Qwen 2.5) were evaluated. Results: The developed corpus demonstrated high annotation reliability ( Conclusion: This study presents a novel emotion-annotated dental consultation corpus and demonstrates the feasibility of a confidence-based hybrid AI framework for automated patient emotion recognition in dentistry. Although the proposed framework achieved the highest numerical performance, the findings should be regarded as preliminary evidence of the potential utility of selective LLM-based re-ranking for recognizing emotionally ambiguous patient utterances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.