Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591152›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Elderspeak from the perspective of hospitalised geriatric patients-insights from a cross-sectional study using a mixed-methods design.

Celina Friedland, Aline Schönenberg, Mia Lintl, Tino Prell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Celina FriedlandDepartment of Geriatrics, Halle University Hospital, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Aline SchönenbergDepartment of Geriatrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Mia LintlDepartment of Geriatrics, Halle University Hospital, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Tino PrellDepartment of Geriatrics, Halle University Hospital, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Elderspeak as a form of ageism is a simplified and patronising communication style characterised by diminutives, collective pronouns and exaggerated prosody. In healthcare, elderspeak can affect the physical and mental health of older patients. Understanding the patient's perspective is essential for developing respectful and dignified communication strategies in contact with older patients. Methods: Video vignettes were used to analyse Results: All patients recognised elderspeak; 88.9% prefer neutral language over elderspeak. Elderspeak appears less professional and polite; qualitative responses indicate that elderspeak goes against normative communication, lacks respect and feels less warm or personal. In addition to linguistic form, contextual factors such as the interpersonal relationship also appear to be important for preferred communication. Conclusion: Geriatric patients recognize elderspeak as an unprofessional an non-normative form of communication that is widely disliked, although contextual factors and personal preference play a role. Overall, communication with patient is an important tool to foster appropriate health behavior and well-being. Future research and practice should aim to reduce elderspeak to avoid potentially negative effects on the well-being and health of older people.

Indexed as

ageing stereotypesageismcommunicationelderspeakolder adultspatient centeredpatient perspective

Identifiers

PMID42591152
PMCPMC13461420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.