ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Serum lipidomic alterations associated with post-stroke cognitive impairment: an exploratory prospective study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a common complication of stroke that adversely affects long-term functional outcomes and quality of life among survivors. However, reliable biomarkers for early risk prediction remain limited. Dysregulation of lipid metabolism has been implicated in ischemic stroke and may contribute to PSCI development. Objective: This study investigated early serum lipidomic alterations associated with PSCI in patients with acute ischemic stroke and evaluated whether integrating lipidomic features with clinical indicators improves predictive performance. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 123 patients with acute ischemic stroke were enrolled. Serum samples were obtained within 24 h of stroke onset, and untargeted lipidomic profiling was performed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry. Cognitive function was assessed at 3 months using the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA). Patients were classified into PSCI and post-stroke cognitively normal (PSCN) groups. Candidate lipids were identified through univariate analysis, multivariable logistic regression, pathway enrichment analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Clinical, lipidomic, and combined prediction models were developed and internally validated. Results: Among the 123 patients, 62 developed PSCI and 61 remained cognitively normal. A total of 1,584 lipid annotations meeting MSI Level 2 criteria were retained for subsequent analyses. Although 87 lipids differed nominally between the PSCI and PSCN groups, none remained significant after false discovery rate correction. After adjustment for clinical confounders, 65 lipids remained nominally associated with PSCI. Pathway enrichment analysis implicated glycerophospholipid metabolism and choline-related phospholipid metabolism. LASSO regression identified LPC 22:6/0:0 as a candidate lipidomic feature. In the internal validation set, the clinical, lipidomic, and combined models yielded areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.746, 0.623, and 0.763, respectively. The combined model demonstrated favorable discrimination and calibration, as well as potential clinical net benefit. Conclusion: These findings suggest early serum lipid metabolic alterations in patients who developed PSCI. LPC 22:6/0:0 may be associated with post-stroke cognitive outcomes, and a model integrating clinical and lipidomic features may support early PSCI risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.