ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
The challenge of patient recruitment into early phase clinical trials: Is time-effective academic translational research feasible? Lessons from a phase I/II trial in patients with B-cell deficiencies.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recruiting patients in early-phase clinical trials poses significant challenges, particularly when targeting specific patient populations. This emerged during the phase I/II B-pVAC-SARS-CoV-2 trial investigating CoVac-1, a peptide-based T-cell activator developed to provide T-cell-mediated protection against severe COVID-19 in individuals with inherited or acquired B-cell deficiencies who were unable to mount adequate antibody responses following approved vaccination AGAINST SARS-CoV-2. Despite promising phase I results in healthy volunteers and high patient interest, recruitment of immunocompromised subjects proved substantially more difficult than initially anticipated. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, combined with the complexity of patient profiles, required assessing 1,024 candidates at one site to finally recruit 61 subjects and extended the recruitment process to over 8 months. Our experience highlights how rigid eligibility criteria and lengthy protocol adaptation processes may unintentionally limit access to promising investigational treatments for patients with urgent unmet medical needs. More flexible, patient-tailored approaches, whenever safety is not compromised, together with more pragmatic approaches to protocol adaptation, for instance driven by expedited consultations with the DSMB, may help improve recruitment, while preserving patient safety and trial integrity, particularly in academic early-phase clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.