Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591123›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

The challenge of patient recruitment into early phase clinical trials: Is time-effective academic translational research feasible? Lessons from a phase I/II trial in patients with B-cell deficiencies.

Maddalena Marconato, Simon Jäger, Christian M Tegeler, Christopher Hackenbruch, Helmut R Salih, Juliane S Walz, Birgit Federmann, Jonas S Heitmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maddalena MarconatoDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Simon JägerClinical Collaboration Unit Translational Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Christian M TegelerClinical Collaboration Unit Translational Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Christopher HackenbruchClinical Collaboration Unit Translational Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Helmut R SalihClinical Collaboration Unit Translational Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Juliane S WalzClinical Collaboration Unit Translational Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Birgit FedermannClinical Collaboration Unit Translational Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Jonas S HeitmannClinical Collaboration Unit Translational Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recruiting patients in early-phase clinical trials poses significant challenges, particularly when targeting specific patient populations. This emerged during the phase I/II B-pVAC-SARS-CoV-2 trial investigating CoVac-1, a peptide-based T-cell activator developed to provide T-cell-mediated protection against severe COVID-19 in individuals with inherited or acquired B-cell deficiencies who were unable to mount adequate antibody responses following approved vaccination AGAINST SARS-CoV-2. Despite promising phase I results in healthy volunteers and high patient interest, recruitment of immunocompromised subjects proved substantially more difficult than initially anticipated. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, combined with the complexity of patient profiles, required assessing 1,024 candidates at one site to finally recruit 61 subjects and extended the recruitment process to over 8 months. Our experience highlights how rigid eligibility criteria and lengthy protocol adaptation processes may unintentionally limit access to promising investigational treatments for patients with urgent unmet medical needs. More flexible, patient-tailored approaches, whenever safety is not compromised, together with more pragmatic approaches to protocol adaptation, for instance driven by expedited consultations with the DSMB, may help improve recruitment, while preserving patient safety and trial integrity, particularly in academic early-phase clinical research.

Indexed as

early-phase clinical trialseligibility criteriainvestigator-initiated trialspatient recruitment challengestranslational research

Identifiers

PMID42591123
PMCPMC13461327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.