ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Perceptions of dogs and animal-assisted support programs among veterinary students and teaching staff in Romania.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal-assisted support programs (AASP) are increasingly used to promote psychological wellbeing in educational settings, yet their acceptability within veterinary education remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess perceptions, knowledge, attitudes, and implementation preferences related to AASP among veterinary students and teaching staff from a Romanian Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 200 students and 99 teaching staff members, using a structured questionnaire addressing demographics, attitudes toward dogs, awareness of AASP, and self-reported mental health-related variables. Group and gender differences were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Overall, respondents demonstrated positive attitudes toward dogs and strong acceptance of AASP. Most participants perceived AASP as potentially beneficial for stress reduction, mental health support, and enhancement of the educational environment, despite limited prior experience with such programs. A considerable proportion of students (20.5%) reported a diagnosed mental health condition, highlighting the relevance of student wellbeing support within the investigated academic setting. Gender differences were observed, with female respondents generally expressing more favorable attitudes and lower risk perception. High willingness to participate and support for the potential introduction of structured AASP and related training opportunities were reported, although concerns regarding anxiety and logistical constraints were acknowledged. These findings indicate a high level of perceived acceptability of AASP among veterinary students and teaching staff and support further investigation of their potential role within student wellbeing initiatives in veterinary higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.