ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Deep learning segmentation with uncertainty quantification for spinal tuberculosis on fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal tuberculosis is the most common extrapulmonary manifestation of tuberculosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), particularly fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI), is the modality of choice for preoperative evaluation; yet indistinct lesion boundaries render manual delineation subjective and poorly reproducible. Although deep learning segmentation has advanced considerably, its "black-box" nature and limited interpretability remain critical obstacles. This study aimed to develop an uncertainty-guided deep learning segmentation framework and evaluate its accuracy and clinical utility. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 210 patients with spinal tuberculosis from an initial cohort of 300 screened at three centers, and acquired preoperative FS-T2WI scans. Data from Center 1 ( Results: On the external test set, the improved model achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.858 and an AUC of 0.912, outperforming all comparative models. Uncertainty correlated strongly and positively with pixel-level error rates (Spearman Conclusion: The proposed uncertainty-guided framework improved spinal tuberculosis lesion segmentation accuracy. Pixel-level uncertainty maps reliably identified unreliable predictions and enhanced clinician trust, offering a robust AI decision-support tool for precise surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.