Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42591070›Full record

ReviewClinical science (London, England : 1979)2026

Macrophage heterogeneity in human secondary lymphoid organs.

Elodie Segura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elodie SeguraINSERM, Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Institut Necker Enfants Malades - INEM, 156 rue de Vaugirard, 75015 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1795-1921

Funding

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages play a major role in immune responses and in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. Most of our knowledge of macrophage biology comes from mouse studies, which have revealed the existence of distinct subpopulations differing in origin, life cycle and tissue-specific features, as well as the influence of tissue perturbations on macrophage heterogeneity. Here, we review the evidence supporting the conservation of these principles in human macrophages, along with the methodological approaches employed, including omics analyses of macrophages from clinical samples, human transplantation studies and studies of monogenic mutations. We also focus on the macrophage populations that are present in human secondary lymphoid organs-namely the spleen, lymph nodes, and tonsils. While some organ-specific features are shared with their mouse counterparts, we highlight important differences between mouse and human lymphoid tissue macrophages in their functional specialization.

Indexed as

Lymph NodesLymphoid TissueMacrophagesSpleenAnimalsHumansPalatine Tonsilhumanlymphoid organmacrophage

Identifiers

PMID42591070
PMCPMC13488968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.