ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
Facilitating Personal Recovery in Individuals With Mental Illness: A Longitudinal Qualitative Interview Study of a Person-Centred Group Intervention.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explored how participation in a person-centred group intervention influenced the personal recovery process of individuals with mental illness at the end of the intervention and 3 months after. Using a qualitative longitudinal design, the study was conducted in an outpatient clinic at the Psychiatric Department of the North Denmark Region. Seventeen participants completed the 12-week intervention, which included two Discovery group sessions and 10 Guided Self-Determination method sessions. Participants were interviewed post-intervention and at three-month follow-up. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke and the CHIME framework with a deductive approach. The intervention positively influenced participants' personal recovery process across all CHIME categories. Being among peers fostered a sense of belonging, trust and mutual understanding leading to greater openness and confidence in relationships within and beyond mental health services. Participation in the intervention enhanced self-understanding, hope and optimism about the future, though some participants emphasized the need for ongoing support to sustain these gains. Engagement in the group promoted self-acceptance and openness about mental illness, increased awareness of factors affecting well-being and encouraged focus on opportunities and quality of life. Participants also reported greater self-reflection, self-esteem and responsibility, leading to a stronger sense of control over their lives. Overall, the person-centred group intervention supported participants' personal recovery process by strengthening connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment. Continued professional support was viewed as essential to sustain and integrate these positive changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.